Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Dengan Menggunakan Metode Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital (RGEC) Pada Bank Muamalat Periode 2013-2017

Ade Yunita

Abstract


The purpose of this research is to determine the health rating of Bank Muamalat seen from Risk Peofile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital (RGEC) aspects during 2013-2017. The data that used in this research  is secondary data, and the researcher take the  financial statements of Bank Muamalat in 2013-2017 as research source. The technique of data analysis that used is the analysis technique of bank health using the Risk approach (Risk Based Bank Rating/RBBR) with the scope of the assessment. There are 4 factors that must be analyzed and it is: Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Profitability (Earnings), Capital (Capital) or usually called RGEC method. The research took the object of research of Bank Muamalat on the grounds that he was interested in seeing Bank Muamalat company becoming opioneer of Islamic banking in Indonesia, this is because Islamic bank were able to obtain and target large markets with the application of its syari’ah system, namely by ensuringthat bank interest is haram. The research took the object of research of Bank Muamalat on the grounds that he was interested in seeing Bank Muamalat company becoming o pioneer of Islamic banking in Indonesia, this is because Islamic bank were able to obtain and target large markets with the application of its syari’ah system, namely by ensuringthat bank interest is haram. The results of the assessment of the health rating of Bank Muamalat as a whole seen from the aspect of Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital (RGEC) during 2013-2017 was in a “healthy enough’’ condition. So that the bank during the period, Bank Muamalat was considered able to deal with significant negative effects of changes in business conditions and other external factors, but when viewed more in each ratio of the assessment indicators, there were several assessment which show criteria that Bank Muamalat were quite healty and even unhealthy. The after conducting on the analysis of health level assessment of  Bank Muamalat using the RGEC method of  Bank Muamalat period with standards set by the financial services authority (OJK) for the period 2013-2017 it can be concluade that Bank Muamalat  composite rating is “Healty Enough”.


Keywords


Risk Profil; Good Corporate Governance; Earnings; Capital

Full Text:

PDF

References


Algifari. 2013. Prosedur Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta : Rineka Cipta

Adinda Putri Ramadhany, Analisis Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Berdasarkan Metode RGEC pada Bank Konvensional BUMN dan Swasta. Studi pada Bank Umum Milik Negara dan Bank Swasta Nasional Devisa yang terdaftar di BEI Periode 2011-2013.

Bank Indonesia. 1998. Surat Keputusan Direksi Bank Indonesia No30/277/KEP/DIRtahun 1998 tentang Perubahan Surat Keputusan Direksi Bank Indonesia Nomor 30/11/KEP/DIR Tanggal 30 April 1997 Tentang Tata cara Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum.

Bank Indonesia. 2004. Peraturan Bank Indonesia No. 6/10/PBI/2004 Perihal Penilian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia

Bank Indonesia. 2004. Surat Edaran Bank Indonesia No.6/ 23 /DPNP tanggal 31Mei 2004 Perihal Penilian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia.

Bank Indonesia. 2013.Surat Edaran Bank Indonesia No. 9/12/DPNP/2007 Perihal Pelaksanaan Good Corporate Governance bagi Bank Umum. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia.

Bank Indonesia. 2011.Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor: 13/1/PBI/2011 Perihal Penilian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia

Bank Indonesia. 2011.Surat Edaran Bank Indonesia No.13/24/DPNP 2011 pada Tanggal 25 oktober 2011 tentang Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum.Jakarta: Bank Indonesia.

Budisantoso, Totok dan Triandaru Sigit. 2006. Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan LainJakarta : Salemba Empat

Hery. 2012. Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Ismail. 2010. Manajemen Perbankan : Dari Teori Menuju Aplikasi, Jakarta: Kencana.

Kasmir. 2012. Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Lasta, Heidy Arrvida dan Zainul Arifin. 2014. Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan RGEC (Studi pada PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia. Tbk Periode 2011-2013). Jurnal Administrasi dan Bisnis. 13(2): 8-10.

Mariani Mamu, Frendy A.O.Pelleng dan Dantje Kelles. 2015. Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank BNI Syariah Tbk dengan menggunakan metode RGEC. Jurnal

Nur Fitriana, Ahmad Rosyid dan Agus Fakhrina. 2015. Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank BUMN Syariah dengan Bank BUMN Konvensional dengan menggunakan metode RGEC periode 2012-2014. Jurnal

Nuritomo, 2014. Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Lain. Jakarta:Salemba Empat

Susanto, Hery. 2016. Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank dengan Menggunakan Metode RGEC. (Studi pada PT. Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk tahun 2010-2014). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis. 35(2): 65-66.

Sugiyono. 2003. Metode Penelitian Administrasi dilengkapi dengan Metode R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Taswan. 2010. Manajemen Perbankan. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN YOGYAKARTA

Teguh, Muhammad. 2016. Metode Penelitian Ekonomi. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia .No. 7 Tahun 1992, tentang Perbankan.

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia .No. 21 Tahun 2008, tentang Perbankan Syariah Sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang No 10 Tahun 1998 pasal 29 ayat 2.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/sms.v2i3.85

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Science of Management and Students Research Journal (SMS)
Publisher: Faculty of Economics, Batanghari University
Jl. Slamet Ryadi, Broni-Jambi, Kodepos: 36122, Phone: 0741-668280, email: sms.unbari@gmail.com

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.